Portal de Archena

www.portaldearchena.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

The Section 1 of the Division of Administrative High Court of Justice of Murcia has ruled in favor of the PSOE in Archena and against the decision that once adopted the People's Party classified as residential soil that was initially considered community facilities, ie a soil change for the use and enjoyment of all archeneros by a floor designed to build buildings.

The scope of this statement is particularly important because it demonstrates - beyond political considerations - the PP Team Archena Government has taken decisions on planning matters that are contrary to law, without respecting the law.

The High Court of Justice of Murcia, the highest decision making body of the Region, said that when the City Council adopted the agreement did not comply with legal procedures, since in such decisions, as well as the Municipal Corporation, had to intervene in the Autonomous Community, which in this case did not happen.

In addition to not respect the legal procedures, there were no urban standards required, ie not taken into account that the Land Law in Murcia set so imperative that for each number of homes built there must be spaces in proportional area for parks, gardens, public ....

The Socialist Group presented to the Court, and this gave us the reason, as the Council's decision was against the law and therefore the general interest of all archeneros, how was inadmissible violation of such important principles as providing space government to our citizens and not a belief that everything was solved with the "brick" economic model that has already been amply demonstrated that it is not acceptable.

The judge has dismissed an argument curtly that brought the city of Murcia, who sought to justify its actions under cover of a court ruling requiring him to make a neighbor town planning, this argument has fallen by its own weight, and it has the court reasoned, because throughout the processing of urban change has not a single justification, evaluation or detail of such compensation ... what would have been easy for the City to demonstrate that the relief finally surrendered to that neighbor, without

But it has not been shown because the destination was not that but to sell the profitable use for cash.

Since the PSOE Archena consider it our duty to defend the rights of our neighbors to have a town with more gardens, parks, public health centers, day care centers ... in short, we advocate a model of sustainable city, which are not changed public spaces for housing, without provision of services and public spaces should be secured.

The Municipal Socialist Group in the city of Archena to wonder how this ruling will be fulfilled, because its obligation linked to the PP government team that's who made the decision at the time, which will now be the consequences if the PP politicians who took this illegal decision will take responsibility, some of them are now in the government team and how it will affect staff in their day they approved.

Source: PSRM-PSOE