The Litigation Division of the Supreme Court has finally reason to Platform Affected by Pylon of the decks.
The final Judgement, requires the City Council officially Archena to review the building permit was granted to more than Iberdrola in 2004 and allowed to install a pylon of 132 kW in the green area of ​​the Unit of Action No. 17, next to the bridge decks and the archaeological site of Cabeco Uncle Pio.
The Chamber of the TSJ, besides amending the flat at Number 1 Court Litigation, which resulted in the first instance because the City Council, says the City has not done its duty, it should have initiated the review procedure office when requested by the neighbors in 2006.
Moreover, according to interpret the legal services of those affected, the Board appreciates that the allegations of the neighbors and their lawyers in the appeal has sufficient importance and overtones from the truth, to start the automatic review record, so Judgement is the review.
Remember that in early July 2009 when the City won the first statement, the mayor pulled from the rooftops, assuming that everything done by the City Council had made since the absolute legality and demanding "political responsibility" the opposition, especially at IU Councilman, Antonio Martinez, who came to demand the resignation (La Opinion 08.07.09).
IU-Greens Archena before this final Judgement, look to the future rather than the past and hopes and expects that the new PP government team now put a bit of rationality and good will, and settled at once, by reviewing ex officio, a problem that drags since 2004, for, if not solved the problem well and last forever, it would deepen even more serious economic damage have been suffering owners of urbanization AU-17, for the development works were halted For over 6 years, from this conflict and deteriorating everything built so far, said spokesman IU-Greens, Antonio Martinez, who is both an owner directly affected by the problem.
Source: IURM