The Popular Party claims that his resignation speak and vote on a development in which land is owned, contrary to what the law says
Antonio Martinez, spokesman for Izquierda Unida Archena the City Council and mayoral candidate in the forthcoming local elections, not only intervened on 28 February in the Plenary Hall at a point on the agenda that dealt with the Private UA -17, in which he personally owns lots, but participated in the vote thereby failing in its duty to abstain from any matter with interest, as stated in the Act (enclosed).
Recall that the Act specifically prohibits not only vote, but even to intervene and force to leave the room "while discussing and voting on the matter", in spots that a Councillor has a personal interest.
Do you have lots of property is not direct and personal interest?
It is not the first time this happens by Councilman, which we are accustomed to intervene to defend "their" house, "his" solar, "their" street "its" development ...
The People's Party calls for the immediate resignation of Speaker of the United Left by this fact, which we consider very serious.
What does the law say?
Law 7 / 1985 dated April 2, Regulation of the Local System.
Article 76.
Without prejudice to the grounds of incompatibility determined by law, members of the local governments should refrain from participating in the deliberations, voting, decision and implementation of a case where one of the causes referred to the administrative and procedural law Public Administration contracts.
Royal Decree 2568/1986 of 28 November, approving the Regulation on organization, functioning and legal status of local authorities.
Article 96.
In those cases, in accordance with the provisions of Article 76 of Law 7 / 1985, a member of the Corporation should abstain from participating in the deliberation and vote, must leave the room while they discuss and vote on the matter, except discuss the case of acting as a corporate, which shall have the right to stay and defend.
Source: PP Archena